Best aspect:
The beautiful location is definitely a highlight! The theatre is gorgeous, and the surrounding area is even better—nothing beats Florida in the spring!
I also really appreciate the educational focus of the competition. There are so many opportunities for the dancers to learn and dance through master classes, rehearsals, and other activities beyond the competition itself. The concept is great and very valuable for the dancers, although at times it felt like a lot to accomplish in such a short amount of time, especially with the demanding schedule.
Worst aspect:
The worst aspect, by far, was the lack of transparency and fairness in the scoring and placements. The favoritism toward Cary Ballet was so blatant that it became difficult to take the results seriously. It went beyond simply having a school perform well—it felt like certain dancers and schools were being given an advantage before the results were even announced. When placements repeatedly don’t seem to reflect what actually happened on stage, it undermines the credibility of the entire competition. A competition can have a beautiful venue, excellent master classes, and a strong educational component, but none of that makes up for results that feel predetermined or influenced by factors other than the dancing itself.
Competition culture:
I’d describe the culture as very polished and welcoming on the surface, but highly political underneath. There is a strong emphasis on making everyone feel included, supported, and part of an educational dance experience, which is positive. However, the favoritism and perceived lack of transparency create a culture where dancers and teachers can feel that relationships and affiliations matter as much as—or sometimes more than—the dancing itself. It gives the impression of smiles and diplomacy publicly, while very different dynamics may be happening behind the scenes.
Attendee culture:
The culture among the attendees felt very competitive and, at times, overly political. There is a lot of support and camaraderie, but there is also a noticeable sense of comparison, cliques, and people being very aware of who is connected to whom. Some attendees are genuinely encouraging and focused on the dancers, while others seem more focused on status, placements, and networking. Overall, it can feel like everyone is being friendly on the surface while quietly watching, comparing, and positioning themselves underneath.
Suggested changes:
I would like to see more transparency, consistency, and fairness in scoring and placements, along with a more genuine culture among the attendees. The politics and fake friendliness were honestly unbearable, and the uncertainty around the results made it difficult to trust the competition.
For full transparency, my dancer has placed in both competitions. Even so, we would not attend this one again. I would much rather do YAGP, where we know what we’re signing up for and what to expect.
Anything else?
Honestly, don’t waste your time or money on this competition. The favoritism, politics, lack of transparency, and uncertainty around placements make the experience frustrating and, in my opinion, not worth the investment. There are better ways to spend a dancer’s time, energy, and money.